Moon Sighting

All of the Moon Sighting News and Resources You Need

Home Introduction Calendars Slideshow Eid al-Adha Moonsighting FAQ Hilal Pictures Articles Why Confusion Updates Volunteers Links Archive

Why Ignore Ahilla






Get all of your town's daily sun & moon information:


Eid al-Adha
Moonsighting FAQ
Hilal Pictures
Why Confusion

Why Do Muslims IGNORE Qur’an’s Ahilla?

A new book “The Astronomical Calculations and Ramadan” by Zulfiqar A Shah (2009) published by IIIT argues for discarding the Hilal of the Qur’an and Sunnah. He is for fixing the Islamic dates by calculation.

Earlier many like Shakir and Qaradawi have argued for it because modern astronomical calculations of lunar rotation are “Qata’i” (exact) and appearance of a Hilal is “Zanni” (inexact)

Since he wrote his article (Islamic Horizon, Sep/Oct. 2006) he has been asked hundreds of time how the astronomical calculation of lunar (Synodical) month of 29 day, 12 hours, 44 minutes and 29 seconds can be the “Meeqat” for an Islamic month of 29 or 30 days. Astronomical calculations of the lunar month are approx 27 ½ days (4) and 29 ½ days. Shah is no different than pre-2000 Fuqaha who kept on issuing Fatwa after Fatwa without rudimentary knowledge of geophysical FACTS.

Ittihad al-Matali, especially the EARLY (Hanafi) Fiqhi position is based on a totally flawed understanding of the geophysical facts:
The Earth is flat, and 2) A Hilal seen anywhere is visible everywhere.

Imam Abu Hanifa made an inference (Qiyas) based on the known assumptions of his times: Any (Islamic or other) calendar has
a) Only ONE date for a 24 hour day
b) The number of days in a month should be the same everywhere.

The Muslims followed a Hilal as the “Mawaqeet” to start the month. The complications arose as early as Hadith of Kuraib (some 50 years after the Prophet's (SAW) death. Fuqaha argued for Itiha al-Matali (unified horizons=Seen anywhere is seen everywhere) and Ikhtilaf al-Matali (Every town by its own sighting). Later Ahnaf changed their Fatwa from Imam Abu Hanifa’s opinion of Ittihad al-Matali to Imam Abu Yusuf and Imam Muhammad’s Ikhtilaf al-Matal’I (also of Imam Shafi’I and others)

From 1950s, "Muslim Unity" (a political need) surpassed "geophysical facts". Since then the Muslim Ulema and astronomical experts were exploited by the political leadership to say what the proponents of "Unity" forced them to say:
1. The New Moon begins the Islamic date

2. The moonset 5 minutes after the sunset begins the Islamic date (1966).
(Later reduced to one minute in 1986, and again in 1999 Jeddah Conference to"Moonset AFTER Sunset” in Makkah. (Let us wait till moonset in Makkah is BEFORE the sunset and AFTER the sunset in Cairo.)

3. The New Moon date is the First of Islamic. (Libya went a step further: the daylight after the conjunction is the first day of Islamic observance.) Now the Muftis came in and started the vacuous debate of Ittihad al-Matali and Ikhtilaf al-Matali.
Hanafi Ulema know it very well that later Ahnaf abandoned Imam Abu Hanifa's Ittihad al-Matali Maslak

4. Muslim astronomers were of No help.
They agreed with Nasser’s “five minutes after the sunset” to the instant of the solar eclipse (Qaradawi)

Now the Muslims are badly confused. Some "astronomers" (icop) have brought in CCD imaging, and others have brought in "Seen by a telescope at mid-day (Iran, etc.). ISNA’s Shah (2008) denied the requirement of seeing a Hilal and Shaukat (, 2005) suggested 12 noon at GMT to begin the Islamic month.

The basic fact remains unchanged: How to DIVIDE "TIME" into DATES, MONTHS, YEARS, etc. on a globe according to Allah's suggestion (2:189): Ahilla are Mawaqeet.